This is the page presented on 6 August 2026, kept
as the record of that call. It has since been superseded by the
interactive CLV scenario planner, which exposes
every lever predict_clv() has — including retention, the two growth hazards,
LAE, the fixed-dollar expense fields and both tenure bases — adds a single-customer mode
that reproduces a worked example term by term, and verifies its own arithmetic against
Python-generated golden vectors on load.
This is that interface, at the preliminary-toolkit stage of the tranche-2 bundle. Move any lever; all three CLV variants and the year-by-year build-up update immediately. Nothing is sent anywhere — the model coefficients are embedded in this page and the arithmetic runs locally, so it works offline and from a PDF-adjacent context.
Toolkit users who want per-customer rather than book-average answers call
predict_clv() directly; this page is the book-average view for people who do not want
to run Python.
| Year | Expected renewals | Loss multiplier | Effective loss ratio | Discount factor | Contribution | Cumulative |
|---|
where, for the selected model, At is premium-weighted expected renewals
in year t, Bt loss-weighted, Nt unweighted;
sP and sL scale those to your premium and loss
ratio; mt is the tenure loss multiplier (1.0 when the toggle is off).
Why weighted aggregates rather than a simple book mean. Renewal counts and premiums are
positively correlated, so mean renewals × mean margin is not the mean of the
products — that shortcut was out by 4–14% here. Carrying premium- and loss-weighted
aggregates makes this page reconcile to predict_clv() to the cent.
Press Reset to book reference and you should read exactly these, which are the same figures the toolkit produces on the seeded book:
| Model | Base | With growth |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid (headline) | $2,886.91 | $3,494.10 |
| BG/NBD | $2,805.31 | $3,498.71 |
| Pareto/NBD | $2,759.37 | $3,394.29 |
| Cox PH | $2,879.44 | $3,498.62 |
| Weibull AFT | $2,688.91 | $3,257.01 |
| Markov | $2,574.99 | $3,128.86 |
BG/NBD's $2,805 / $3,499 are the same two numbers as case study 3 on the July 16 page — the $693 filing-vs-planning gap. Figures are consistent across calls by construction, not coincidence.
cas_clv.scenarios.Coefficients embedded from
python docs/calls/phase4_cohort_scenario_data.py §F, set_seed(42).
Reference: premium $4,013.37 · loss ratio 0.5603 · acquisition 0.40 · renewal 0.20 ·
cross-sell $150 (credited once) · upsell $100 (recurring) · horizon 5 · discount 8%.
Companion materials: call brief · decision poll · cohorts & scenarios deep dive